top of page
Search

Can an Enforced Adjudication Decision Be Stayed? Insights from a Landmark CIPAA Malaysia Case

BY CIPAA ADVISORS


Infographic showing CIPAA claim process and construction adjudication in Malaysia, highlighting unpaid construction claims and CIPAA enforcement steps


Can an Enforced Adjudication Decision Be Stayed? Insights from a Landmark CIPAA Malaysia Case


Understanding the Limits of Stay Applications Under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act (CIPAA 2012 Malaysia)


Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Boundaries in CIPAA Adjudication and Enforcement


In a significant legal development shaping the future of construction adjudication in Malaysia, the Federal Court recently ruled on the limits of stay applications under Section 16 of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act (CIPAA) 2012 Malaysia. The core issue revolved around whether a stay can be granted under CIPAA Section 16(1)(b) after an adjudication decision has already been enforced under Section 28 of CIPAA Malaysia.


The case involved ASM Development (KL) Sdn Bhd and Econpile (M) Sdn Bhd, where Econpile initiated CIPAA adjudication proceedings due to unpaid construction claims in Malaysia related to interim valuations. The adjudicator awarded Econpile over RM59 million, which ASM failed to pay. Econpile proceeded with CIPAA enforcement in Malaysia, leading to the High Court granting an enforcement order under CIPAA Section 28.


While ASM filed for a stay under CIPAA Section 16, the Federal Court clarified that such a stay is impermissible once a CIPAA adjudication decision has been enforced, unless the decision is first set aside under CIPAA Section 15. The court emphasized that adjudication under CIPAA is intended to resolve construction payment disputes in Malaysia quickly and ensure cash flow to the unpaid party, consistent with the purpose of the CIPAA 2012 legal framework.


The Federal Court reaffirmed the ratio in View Esteem Sdn Bhd v. Bina Puri Holdings Sdn Bhd, ruling that allowing a stay after enforcement would be contrary to the CIPAA adjudication process and the statutory intention of the Act. Construction contract disputes in Malaysia must respect the finality (albeit temporary) of adjudication decisions until set aside.


The judgment further explored the CIPAA claim process, highlighting that stay applications must be considered with caution. In situations where an adjudication decision is not set aside, all parties must comply with its terms. This reinforces the role of CIPAA adjudicators in Malaysia and strengthens the predictability of CIPAA legal services.


For industry professionals, contractors, and consultants, this case provides a vital precedent on how to file a CIPAA claim, enforce it, and respond to CIPAA payment disputes. The ruling also clarified that financial health, such as the ability to repay, may be relevant but not determinative in stay applications.


Whether you're engaging a CIPAA lawyer in Malaysia, seeking CIPAA consultant services, or preparing for CIPAA claim submission, it is essential to understand that adjudication decisions are binding unless successfully set aside. This case forms part of evolving CIPAA case studies shaping construction dispute resolution in Malaysia.


If you're navigating construction adjudication in Malaysia, consult a qualified CIPAA lawyer Malaysia to get reliable CIPAA legal advice and assistance with enforcement, including options like CIPAA direct payment.


Conclusion: Know Your Rights Under CIPAA Malaysia


This Federal Court ruling sends a clear message: the integrity of CIPAA adjudication Malaysia must be preserved. Adjudication decisions carry legal weight and cannot be stayed post-enforcement unless set aside. To manage construction payment disputes in Malaysia effectively, parties must engage the right professionals and understand the mechanics of CIPAA Malaysia.


For expert guidance, contact experienced CIPAA consultants in Malaysia or a reputable CIPAA lawyer Malaysia to navigate your CIPAA claim process with confidence.



Need Help?


Let us help you recover your construction debt under CIPAA. Contact us today for affordable CIPAA claim services and speak to the best CIPAA claim consultants in Malaysia.


 
 
 

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.

Financing

Allix Holdings offers in-house financing for CIPAA claims, helping construction businesses overcome financial hurdles in recovering payments.

 

Get quick access to capital, flexible terms, and expert support.

 

Apply for Claim Financing Options

CIPAA ADVISORS

Allix Holdings Sdn. Bhd.

Tower J, Soho KL, 

Solaris Mont Kiara,

50480 Kuala Lumpur.

By accessing and using this website, you agree to comply with and be bound by the following terms and conditions:

  1. Content: The content on this website is for informational purposes only and may change without notice.

  2. Use of Information: You may use the information on this website for personal, non-commercial purposes only.

  3. Intellectual Property: All content on this website is protected by copyright and intellectual property laws.

  4. Third-Party Links: We are not responsible for the content of any linked third-party websites.

  5. Privacy: Your use of this website is also governed by our Privacy Policy.

  6. Disclaimer: This website is provided "as is" without any warranties.

  7. Limitation of Liability: We are not liable for any damages arising from your use of this website.

  8. Governing Law: These terms are governed by the laws of Malaysia.

©2023 CIPAA ADVISORS (Registered Trademark)

Proudly curated and managed by

Allix Holdings Sdn. Bhd.

bottom of page